Zachary Quinto & Jonathan Groff: Dog Walking Duo

Zachary Quinto & Jonathan Groff: Dog Walking Duo


Subsequent to the break up between Star Trek’s Zachary Quinto and his long term boyfriend Jonathan Groff, the pair have remained good friends. The romance ended quietly and the pair parted amicably in January 2013. In July of the same year, the duo were spotted walking their gorgeous pooches in Los Feliz California. They were spotted laughing as they exercised with their dogs. Subsequently, a rather scruffy looking Zachary was spotted again not too long after the break up was announced near Washington Square Park in New York City walking his dogs. Image source:


Zachary Quinto & Jonathan Groff: Dog Walking Duo

Image source:
In September 2012, rumors had already started circulating regarding a potential rift between them due to their enormously demanding work schedules.

Zachary Quinto revealed his sexuality in October 2011 and soon after than started dating the Glee star, Jonathan Groff but only going public about their relationship the following year.

Zachary Quinto upon revealing his sexuality said that as a gay man he felt that there was so much work still to be done. He was also very vocal about bullying of young gay men and lesbians, making the It Gets Better campaign video.

In 2014 Zachary Quinto reunited with two exes Jonathan Groff and Jesse Tyler Ferguson for a performance at the Public Theatres Manhattan Gala. They sang songs from Chorus Line and the show was dubbed a “thrilling combination”

Jonathan Groff raised to prominence with the lead role of Melchior Gabor in 2006 in the Broadway classic Spring Awakening. He was subsequently nominated with a Tony award for Best Actor in a Musical. In 2015 he returned back to Broadway to perform in King George III in Hamilton and this once again earned him another Tony Award nomination for Best Featured Actor in a Musical.

Jonathan Groff publicly came out in October 2009 and has been an active voice for the Lesbian and Gay Community. In 2010 he was a target for in a highly controversial article by Ramin Setoodeh who debated that a gay actor was incapable of playing a straight character in a convincing manner. This article received massive backlash with loads of public figures including Jonathan Groff, who defended Hayes, Groffs, and Harris performance as straight characters decrying it as homophobic.

Jonathan Groff has taken many projects on screen and on stage touching on the issue of same sex marriages. With his many years of active voice for the gay community and the recent events with the supreme court legalizing same sex marriages, Groff stated that his immediate thoughts went to the years of activism which culminated this event.

“I didn’t expect to be as genuinely emotional and excited about being an American as I am today,” he said. “I just feel so grateful to all of the activists. I’m benefiting from the decades of turmoil and frustration and work that has been done on my behalf. Now it’s official, and it’s mind-blowing to me.”

Jonathan Groff is excited with the social change which is transforming the entertainment industry chronicling the real world events. “I think of ‘Looking’ as more of a reflection of what’s happening,” he said. “For my money, the activists who have been fighting so hard for decades for this legislation, those people are the real heroes.”

History Comedy

The History of Comedy

Have you ever wondered what comedy used to be like, or where it originated? Obviously, comedy has immensely evolved from what it used to be. So, continue below to learn about the history of comedy.

Ancient Greek Comedy

The first origins of comedy trace all the way back to Aristophanes in 425 BCE. Aristophanes was an ancient Greek playwright and satirical author who wrote over 40 comedies, all of which were viewed as highly obscene. Other forms of comedy originated in ancient Greece, these forms include songs and recitations of phallic processions.

Then, in 335 BCE, Aristotle declared that the phallic processions were a huge milestone for comedy. He taught his followers that comedy was a positive thing for society, as it brought out the happiness and lightheartedness of every situation. Also, Aristotle helped define what true comedy is, and how it is the third for of literature.

Elizabethan Comedy

Comedy continued to evolve and take different forms, but in the 16th century, comedy became extremely popular in theatre. One of the most famous Elizabethan comic playwrights is Shakespeare. Shakespeare’s comedy plays all contain; a happy ending, a tone and lighthearted style, and a special event or marriage. The structures of Shakespeare’s comedies paved the way to how comedy plays are written today.

19th to 20th Century Comedy

In the early 19th century, comedians in England began to create slapstick comedy, as well as comedy sketches without dialogue. Some of the most popular comedians in England, during this time, were; Charlie Chaplin, Stan Laurel, and Dan Leo. In addition to the new comedy forms in England, American vaudeville emerged.

Modern Day Comedy

Modern day comedy began to emerge at the beginning of the 20th century. In the early 20th century, television and radio became increasingly popular. Thus, the public no longer had to travel cross-country to see various performers. Instead, they just had to tune into their local radio station, or one of the T.V channels. Since television and radio allowed people from all over to listen to and watch comedians, comedians became extremely successful.

In addition to television and radio, films enabled comedians to get their big break in Hollywood. Stand-up comedians often taped specials for television channels, as well as starring in new television shows and movies. A few television shows proved to be monumental for comedy and television, they include; Saturday Night Live, The Simpsons, Seinfeld, and M*A*S*H. Those shows not only created success for many American stand-up comedians and actors, but it paved the way for how comedians began their careers, all over the world. Some American television shows, like The Simpsons, showed that comedy could be a tad bit more obscene, and didn’t have to just poke at stereotypes.

The United States were not the only place for comic advancement. During the beginning of the 20th century, comedy began rapidly growing in Hong Kong, Bollywood, and France. The most notable out of those three locations is Hong Kong, which played a key role in shaping what comedy is within movies. Overall, without the creation and popularization of radio, television, and film, the field of comedy would never have shaped into what it is today.


“Looking”: 1×08 – Looking Glass HD Screen Captures


Hey everybody! I just updated the gallery with 734 HD screen captures of Jonathan from the season one finale of “Looking.” What did you guys think of the finale? Leave a comment to share your thoughts. Now that “Looking” is over for the season, I will hopefully be diving in and updating the gallery with some new (and old) things. I hope you enjoy and keep checking back for more updates!


Vulture Interview: Jonathan Groff Dishes on Season 2 of “Looking”

“Vulture” — Clad in a hoodie and a rainbow-emblazoned shirt that says “SAN FRANCISCO” in huge letters, Jonathan Groff sits opposite me at Starbucks, regarding his cup of coffee skeptically. “To be honest,” he admits, “I had never drank coffee in my life before I came to San Francisco!” But a lot has changed for Groff since he relocated to the Bay Area to start working on HBO’s gay drama Looking, and there are even more firsts to come in season two (debuting tonight), as Groff’s character Patrick finds himself romantically torn between his British boss Kevin (Russell Tovey) and his ex-flame Richie (Raul Castillo). I met up with Groff last November just after he’d shot his final scene of the season; here’s what he had to say about working on season two, the fan reaction when the show first debuted, and how he deals with shooting those intimate sex scenes.

When you read scripts now that you’ve been doing this for two seasons, do you feel like the writers are tailoring your character to specific things they know about you in real life?
Yes, absolutely. It’s dangerous to share too much! But the thing is that since there’s not a lot of gay shows on TV, there’s really an opportunity to try to show something as realistic as possible. When I see the stuff in the script that I’ve said in real life, I cringe slightly, but then I also feel proud of it. I think the show is really personal, and certainly the most personal thing I’ve ever worked on. It was that way at the very first audition: My skin got hot and I started sweating and feeling very nervous, and that was the first time I realized, “Oh wow, this is really close to the bone.” And it continued to be that way, but that’s also what made me want to do it.

And season two still feels like that?
Even more than season one. What I was nervous about coming into the second season was, “I hope they don’t do that thing on TV shows where a season builds to something and then the next season, it’s like they push a reset button” and then you’re like, “What did I invest all of that time for?” And they really didn’t do that. They dug further and deeper into the characters that were already there, and they don’t tie anything up neatly in a bow, and they really engaged with what they set up in the first season.

What did you make of the initial reaction to the first season?
The negativity was surprising. But then the energy about the show kind of shifted as it got toward the end, and if people stuck with it, —some people didn’t, which is unfortunate — it put into context what we were trying to say. I think there were a lot of people who thought, “Oh it’s the gay Sex and the City,” or “It’s the gay Girls,” but it’s it’s own entity. It isn’t a particularly flashy show. It’s a quiet show, and so I think once people understood the tone of it, then our ratings improved and the negative swell sort of dissipated a little bit, which was nice.

There’s more sex in season two.
The sex scenes have never freaked me out, and that’s because I feel like it’s such an opportunity. I had seen Weekend [directed by Looking executive producer Andrew Haigh] and the sex felt so real to me in that, so I was so ready to jump in. I’ve told Andrew, “I will literally do anything for you.” I just trust him implicitly. He said that he thinks that sometimes directors get a little fearful of intimacy, so they shoot those scenes from afar, and he said, “I think in sex scenes it’s important to go all the way in and really capture what’s happening, to be brave enough to go in on the actors, and get up in their faces and their bodies to see what’s actually going on between them, as opposed to stepping back because it’s a little uncomfortable.”

In season one, your most graphic sex scene with Raul played out mostly on your face.
Yeah, you’re right. I didn’t think about that. I remember Andrew was like, “I really want you guys to look at each other. I want there to be eye contact in this. It’s not just him going down on you — it’s a true moment of connection.”

Must have been a rough day at work.
I know, it’s an embarrassment of riches — and Russell Tovey as well! I’m very lucky, they’re both so attractive and so brave and so down to go there.

Do you think Looking tells certain stories that straight shows can’t?
I read the final script of the season and it sort of felt like when you hear a song that you haven’t heard before but you think you have, because you immediately get the emotion of it. There’s something specific between Kevin and Patrick that happens in the final episode and then there’s something specific between Dom and Doris that happens, two conversations that happen where I thought they were very specific to the gay experience. There are certain conversations that you have the opportunity to tell in the context of a gay show that are very universal that haven’t really been told that often or as in depth.

In the specific, you find the universal.
One of the straight female women in our production office was walking by me one day, and she was like, “Groff, how are you?” And I was like “Man, I’m just kind of like blown away that I lived the 10th episode.” And she was like, “Me too, me and my last boyfriend had this exact same fight.” Even though it does feel so specifically gay, she related to it — which is also interesting, and that makes me learn something. I was like, “Oh wow, I didn’t know that this particular conversation happened that often in straight relationships.” But it does, I guess.

What kind of responsibility do you feel when you’re number-one on the call sheet?
That’s so funny. It doesn’t even feel like that. There’s this weird hierarchy in film and television where if you’re higher up on the call sheet, you’re somehow more important than the other people. It’s not like when you do theater, where everybody shows up at the theater at the same time, everybody leaves at the same time, everybody gets their own props and does their own makeup.

Groff, you’re not going to pretend to me that you’ve never encountered a diva in theater.
No, of course! Are you kidding me? There are fucking assholes everywhere. But in film and TV, someone walks you to your trailer and walks you to get your breakfast. I feel like the more jobs I do, the smaller I realize the actors are a cog in a bigger wheel. I feel bad saying that.

How come?
Not to say that actors aren’t important, because they are obviously, but on stage, you’re in charge of the final cut of your performance. On a film set, you’re so at the mercy of the focus puller, the DP, the editor … our performances get chopped and cut up and you never know how it’s going to go. But on Looking, I happily feel like a piece of the puzzle, and we’re very much in Andrew’s visual world, which is such a gift. When you get to have opportunities like this one where the person who’s in charge of the overall visual landscape is in my opinion like a genius, then you can go for it. Like I said earlier, and even beyond just the sex stuff, I would do anything he asked me to do.

I’m starting to think you’d be his hit man.
I would, I totally would. I’ve literally drank the Kool-Aid, we all have. If Andrew asked me to do anything, I would do it. And I also have to say, all joking aside, I feel like for the chemistry of a group it’s so important to have the one person that everybody can defer to at the end of the day.

Looking really seemed to coincide with this boom in facial hair amongst gay men. You’re the only person on the show without any scruff.
Am I the only one?

Well, not Doris.
Although if you look close enough… [Laughs.]

I was just reading about the “lumbersexual,” the gay man with a beard who wears plaid and can brew his own artisanal beer …
Our show is full of them! Murray Bartlett is like the epitome of lumbersexual.

So is Michael Lannan, your show’s creator!
Michael’s more lumberjack-y because he’s so tall.

Speaks softly, carries a big ax?
I love that! You need to coin that. That’s really good — “speaks softly, carry a big ax.” Let’s make a t-shirt for Michael!


Well, that’s a wrap for season two! You can browse through 1,000 high definition screen captures of Jonathan from last night’s season two finale of “Looking.” What did you guys think of the finale? Leave a comment to share your thoughts. You can also check out HBO’s “Inside the Episode” segment for the finale. It’s definitely worth the watch and gives us a lot more insight into the episode. Enjoy!

Jonathan Groff Part of ‘Story of Frozen’ on ABC Tuesday Night

Jonathan Groff Part of ‘Story of Frozen’ on ABC Tuesday Night

An interview with stage, screen and TV actor Jonathan Groff, a Lancaster County native, is part of a television program that will take viewers behind the scenes of a popular Disney movie.

“The Story of Frozen: Making a Disney Animated Classic,” premieres from 8-9 p.m. Tuesday on ABC.

The show looks at the origins and production of the musical film “Frozen,” which won the Oscar in March for best animated feature.

Groff, 29, who grew up in Ronks and graduated from Conestoga Valley High School, voiced the character of Kristoff the mountain man in “Frozen.”

Tuesday’s program is hosted by Josh Gad, who portrayed the comical snowman, Olaf, in the film.

The film also starred Kristen Bell and Idina Menzel as sisters Anna and Elsa. Both actresses will also be interviewed on Tuesday’s show, as will Pixar and Walt Disney Animation Studios chief creative officer, John Lasseter.

According to Disney Animation Studios, Tuesday’s program will take viewers behind the scenes at the studio, and reveal how the creative team behind the film was inspired by the 1844 Hans Christian Andersen story, “The Snow Queen,” and by landscapes in Norway that served as templates for the land of Arendelle featured in “Frozen.”

Since his work on “Frozen,” Groff has been starring in the HBO series “Looking,” and had a role in the network’s Emmy-winning TV movie, “The Normal Heart.”

He has been featured in such TV shows as “Glee” and “Boss”; received a best-actor Tony nomination for the musical “Spring Awakening” on Broadway; has done stage work in London’s West End and in Los Angeles; won an Obie Award for his off-Broadway work; and has appeared in films including “Taking Woodstock,” “The Conspirator” and “C.O.G.”

Groff introduced fellow “Frozen” star Idina Menzel at this year’s Tony Awards, and was a presenter at last month’s Creative Emmy Awards.

Before heading to Broadway after high school, Groff performed in local theater productions at such venues as the Fulton Opera House and the Ephrata Performing Arts Center.

Tuesday’s “The Story of Frozen” program will also delve into future plans for the “Frozen” story. It will include a preview of an upcoming appearance by “Frozen” characters Anna, Elsa and Kristoff on an episode of the ABC program “Once Upon a Time.”

“Frozen” producer Peter Del Vecho also said last week that a stage musical adaptation of the film is being developed.

The musical will feature a score by Robert Lopez and Kristen Anderson-Lopez, who won the Oscar earlier this year for best song for the film’s power ballad, “Let It Go.”

“The Story of Frozen” is scheduled to air Tuesday at 8 on WHTM, channel 27; WPVI, channel 6; and WMAR, channel 2.


“Looking” creator executive producer Michael Lannan talks with TV Line about the season two finale, the future of the show, Patrick and gang, what’s next for season three, and so much more! This article isn’t necessarily Jonathan related, but since it’s about his main project and his character Patrick gets some mention, I figured it would be a nice read for the “Looking” fans. Enjoy and stay tuned for high definition screen captures of Jonathan from last night’s season two finale!

TV Line — HBO’s Looking closed out its second season Sunday much the same way it ended its first: With Patrick jockeying between Kevin and Richie. The one key difference? This time around, Richie had the advantage, at least that’s my take on the sweet, subdued closing scene.
Below, series creator Michael Lannan offers his interpretation of that barber shop-set cliffhanger, clarifies the state of Patrick and Kevin’s tattered relationship, and teases the possibility of a new romance for Patrick in Season 3 (assuming there is a Season 3).
Oh, and yeah, he knows how you feel about Agustin.
TVLINE | When Patrick told Richie, “I’m ready,” what was he really referring to? Because it wasn’t the buzzcut.
[Laughs] He’s ready to go after what he wants. I don’t necessarily think he’s saying he’s ready for Richie though. He just reaches a new place within himself, and has a better idea of what direction he wants to go in with his emotional life and his relationships.
TVLINE | But it can’t be a coincidence that the person he goes to at that moment is Richie.
No. Definitely not. Kevin’s last question to Patrick is, “Do you trust me?” And I think Patrick answers that question [by going] to someone he does trust, someone he feels safe with and is on the same page with him in many ways. It’s not a coincidence but it’s inconclusive what’s going to happen between Patrick and Richie.
TVLINE | Was Patrick looking for a reason to cut and run from Kevin? Because he was really blowing the Grindr thing out of proportion.
That’s an interesting question. Kevin has that great line: “Is this fight to keep us together or to break us up?” I don’t know the answer. People will probably see it both ways. He did react very strongly, but he also [raised] a good point that they have different ideas about relationships and monogamy.
TVLINE | Some fans find Patrick’s brand of innocence and naiveté cloying. And I’m sure this finale won’t do anything to change their opinion, especially with regard to the Grindr stuff. The fact that he would be shocked that Kevin would still have the ap on his phone seemed a bit of a reach, even for him.
I think it was more of a culmination of things for Patrick. He may have been overreacting. He may be naive. But something really resonated for him in this situation. Perhaps it triggered some other things about Kevin. I personally don’t think it’s unusual for people to have Grindr on their phones to just check out the scene.
TVLINE | I’m calling bull–t on Patrick’s claim that he deleted Grindr off his phone.
[Laughs] You could be right.
TVLINE | Did Patrick and Kevin break up?
I think it’s ambiguous. Patrick is clearly turning away from Kevin in that moment. It’s not conclusive but it seems likely at this point. It was a pretty big rupture.
TVLINE | If there’s no Patrick and Kevin, does Russell Tovey still have a major presence on the show moving forward? He’s not really part of that core circle of friends.
We love Russell and we want to have him in the show as much as possible. We’re still thinking about what happens between Patrick and Kevin.
TVLINE | I’m sure you’re aware that Agustin isn’t the most beloved character on the show.
TVLINE | Was his arc this season — the new boyfriend, the new career working with homeless teens — part of a concerted effort on your part to make him more sympathetic in viewers’ eyes?
I don’t know if we thought of it in those terms exactly. We wanted to force him into relationship with someone who helps others professionally, and into a world where people need help and guidance. And Agustin hasn’t really had to be around people like Eddie. Nor had he had people really need him in that way. We wanted to see what would happen if we put him in an environment where he was forced to think of other people beside himself. And I think the end result has been him becoming a lot more sympathetic to a lot of people, and we’re happy with that, too. It’s shown another side to him; he’s gotten deeper and richer and more complicated. But people like Agustin don’t ever change completely.
TVLINE | What’s been the motivation for keeping Dom from tasting success?
We wanted to show that not everyone’s dreams come true and you can still find a way to be happy. There are so many interesting dynamics that come up in that journey, one of them being the rupture between Dom and Doris and how money can come between friends. And how your dreams for yourself can confuse your relationships, especially when you’re overly ambitious.
TVLINE | Did you write tonight’s episode as a season finale or a series finale?
We wanted to write a season finale, because we feel like there’s much more to come with Patrick and Kevin and Richie and that entire world. We didn’t think of it as an ending to the entire series.
TVLINE | Looking ahead, and let’s assume all goes well and you get that pickup, is it fair to say that Season 3 would show us what a Patrick-Richie relationship looks like?
We’re still thinking about that. It may be about what happens with Patrick and Richie now. I don’t think Kevin is completely out of the picture though. But, also, there’s space for some entirely new possibilities that Patrick hasn’t even experienced yet. His statement about being “ready” at the end of the episode — I think we’re going to find out what he’s ready for.
TVLINE | Hmm… I have to say, whenever Patrick’s in a scene with Dom, my antennae picks up a spark or two. There’s something there. You agree?
[Laughs nervously] Oh, Michael… I don’t know if I can go there. But I will say they obviously have a history together so… who knows?